
Recently, historical books have been written in a distinct style: They have been telling broad and complex histories by focusing on a narrow story of a person, place, or event that serves as a representative of a larger, richer world. I think this is a great way to turn what might otherwise be a dry story into one more engaging and accessible. Dave Von Drehle’s book on the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire in 1911 dealt with much more than just the factory fire; it discussed the labor and women’s rights movements, and painted a vivid picture of New York City 100 years ago. Ron Cherno’s great work, The House of Morgan (one of my top-ten favorite works of history) examined the history of the J.P. Morgan bank, and in the process offered a detailed history of American finance and the rise of its powerful banks, the Great Depression, Japanese-American relations leading up to World War II, and much more. When it works, this is a great way to tell a story, but so pervasive is this style of history that it almost comes as a relief to find a book that tries to tell the whole story of an age. Daniel Walker Howe’s What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America 1815-1848 is such a book. As Howe candidly notes, his “book tells a story; it does not argue a thesis.” It simply tells the story of America over a thirty three year span; an audacious and ambitious book, but won that delivers.
What Hath God Wrought Walks the reader through America in the thirty three year period beginning with the waning days of The War of 1812 and ends with the close of the Mexican-American war. Howe does a fantastic job of telling a rich story of a people in a state of flux, spiritual enrichment, economic upheaval, growing confidence, and expansion. What makes this story special is that it’s as if Howe leaves no stone unturned, and then connects the events to one another in a web as complex and interwoven as the American people. For example, he discusses America’s deepening protest religious faith (and the birth of Mormon, Quaker, Shaker, and millennial beliefs), and shows how the desire to be able to read to the bible helped create a highly literate society, which in turn made for a large market for newspapers and political information, in turn enriching the democratic underpinnings of the young nation. The incredible technological advances, which allowed the American country to grow in size also brought about radical change. These developments included the railroads and canals (like the Erie), which helped bring frontier agriculture to New York City and to the world market beyond; mass printed newspapers which helped spread news of the nation, its politics, conflicts, and ideas to a wide readership. Most importantly in this time, the development of the telegraph brought down the time it took for communication to travel in a way seldom dreamt of before. The book’s title, What Hath God Wrought, is taken from the first telegraph message sent (fittingly, it was sent carrying news from the Democratic national convention in Baltimore to the White House. The phrase is also biblical in origin).
The book chronicles many of the great triumphs for the nation during this period. One such silent victory has to do with women’s education. Howe wrote:
“The United States pioneered higher education for women, and by 1880 one-third of all American students enrolled in higher education were female, a percentage without parallel elsewhere in the world. Scholars have often debated how far American history is ‘exceptional’ by comparison with the rest of the world. No better example of American exceptional-ism exists than higher education for women.”
It might be a stretch to say there were no governing themes in the book. Technological developments were at the core of much of America’s changes at the time. The communications revolution affected nearly every facet of society. Slavery was an ever present issue. It helped defined parties, southern aristocratic and plantation culture, and was the nucleus of a whole economic system (not by the way, only in the south. The cotton that was picked in the slave states made its way to New England mills where it was woven into fabrics and exported to England and elsewhere, making mill-owners rich in the process). But if there is one aspect of American society and activity that the book focuses on, it is the Presidents and great men of the Congress. The discussion of the rise and fall of the Whig party is enough to make the book worth picking up for its own sake. John Quincy Adams, the 6th president of the United States, also a former Secretary of State, and Senator, made a number of appearances throughout the book in his role as a congressman (it is hard for us to think imagine a President choosing to continue serving in elected office as a Congressman after their presidency ended, but Adams loved it- far more than he had the Presidency itself). He was in many ways the voice for the voiceless in the early 19th century. Adams introduced petitions of women, slaves, and freed blacks into Congress and forced Congress to debate, time and again, legislation designed to limit discussion of slavery issues in Congress.
It was Andrew Jackson, however, who did more to set the course of events in the pre-civil war decades. Jackson’s political life spans the lenth of the book. He was the hero of the War of 1812. Ironically, his great victory in New Orleans, the battle that made him famous and brought him to national prominence, in fact took
place after the war had officially ended. News traveled slow before the telegraph, and word of the peace treaty ending the war made its way across the Atlantic Ocean after the battle of New Orleans had been fought. It was Jackson’s fame as a war hero that propelled him to the White House, but it was his battle against the Bank of the United States that had its most enduring consequences. And has Howe points out, it is full of irony that Jackson’s picture should adorn the twenty dollar bill.
The book concludes with the Mexican-American war. It is perhaps America’s more forgotten and misunderstood war; and it was the war that did more to change the geographical boundaries of the American frontier than any other. Perhaps it is our most forgotten war because it was largely a war of aggression, instigated by President Polk in his quest to realize the “manifest destiny” of a country from sea to sea. It is ironic that much of the Texan territory was occupied by illegal immigrants from the United States into Mexico. America’s actions at the time make its claims on the Mexican territories look like the spoils of war. It is hard to believe today, but in the 1840s, American armies marched from Veracruz to Mexico City, and after defeating Mexico’s armies, American soldiers raised the U.S. flag over the Zocalo, as they began occupying one of the world’s great cities of the time. But as Howe jarringly put it, “In the long run of history, however, in some respects, the seizure of [the former Mexican territories] did work as Polk expected, for ‘the general interests of mankind.’ For example, it enabled a strong stand to be taken against the aggressions of imperial Japan in the 1940s. God moves in mysterious ways, and He is certainly capable of bringing good out of evil.”

This book does not shy away from exposing the ugly aspects of American culture in the first half of the 19th century. Howe’s book offers an exacting and critical look at the American-Indian Wars, including those with the Seminoles of Florida, who resisted Andrew Jackson’s expulsion of the eastern Indians to the plain states along the Trail of Tears. And of course much of the book focuses on the expansion of slavery and the hardening of positions between slavery proponents and opponents during this time. “American history between 1815 and 1848 certainly had its dark side: poverty, demagogy, disregarded for legal restraints, the perpetuation and expansion of slavery, and the dispossession of the Native Americans, and the waging of aggressive war against Mexico...” But Howe also tells of the epic triumphs and achievements of the American people; their achievements and developments in technology, democracy, and spiritual enrichment. It is Howe’s ability to tell the story of America’s development during this period from every conceivable angle and to delve deeply into so many themes that made the antebellum Americans who they were, no doubt contributed to the author’s book being awarded the Noble Peace Prize for Literature and the Pulitzer Prize. It is a book I will not soon forget. Now tell me your thoughts on What Hath God Wrought!
“The Civil War was fought in 10,000 places...”
I had intended for this to be a blog reviewing great books. I think it’s a bit ironic then, that my first post here is on a movie. But it is on a movie so epic, on a war and of times so thought-provoking, that I think it’s fitting for this to be the first of Root’s Reviews. Ken Burns may be the greatest documentarian ever, and his nine episode saga on the Civil War is probably his greatest work (I hear Baseball is excellent, as well). Ken Burns’ 10 plus hour film, Civil War http://www.pbs.org/civilwar/, is such a well done documentary, that I’m sure it is just as enthralling to watch today as it was over twenty years ago when the documentary first aired. When it did air on PBS over five consecutive nights back in 1990, it was watched by some forty million viewers, making it the most-watched program to ever air on PBS.
Ironically, I think the thing that makes the nine-volume movie such a rich experience, is that for a motion picture, it doesn’t have much in the way of motion. Most of the visual content in the episodes are views of still photographs, of which over a million were taken during the Great War (Most were lost or destroyed soon after; In the immediate postbellum years, no one wanted to see them). More than 16,000 archived photographs, maps, and paintings were drawn on by Burns for his film. They all give the documentary a vintage, contemporaneous feel, as if the documentary was being filmed in the 1860s. The best part of the whole film, for me, was the interviews with historians, like Shelby Foote. The interviews with Mr. Foote were such a treat to watch. He told dozens of stories and anecdotes of soldiers and generals that were absolutely wonderful, and told in his thick, southern drawl. I’ve never read one of his books, but I have no doubt now that he knew more about the Civil War than any man living or dead.
The general history of the Civil War is well known to most Americans: the South seceded to protect states rights and to preserve the institution of slavery (cynics might say that the former is just an excuse for the later), Abraham Lincoln was president and ordered the northern army to bring the rebel Confederate states back into the union by force. The war was won for the union, the slaves were freed, and Lincoln was assassinated. One might expect this to be the place where I’d say something like, “but there is a much more nuanced and complex story behind the war.” But the amazing thing about the Civil War, is that it really was a remarkably simple affair. One of my favorite accounts in the movie (told by Mr. Foote) was of a Confederate solider caught by union troops somewhere in Virgina. He was poor and clearly didn’t own slaves. The union troops asked him, “Why are you fighting us anyway?” And he replied, “Because you are down here.” A rather satisfactory answer, no?
The challenge for telling the story of the Civil War well, was in telling the tales of the individuals who lived through it. What Burns does is to introduce the viewers to lowly infantry soldiers, slaves, former-slaves-turned-soldiers, great generals from the north and south, abolitionists like Frederick Douglas, southern aristocrats, politicians like the Confederacy’s president Jefferson Davis, and of course the nearly irreproachable President Lincoln - all in their own words. Throughout the nine episodes, great narrators, like David McCullough, Kurt Vonnegut and Morgan Friedman read letters, diaries, and contemporaneous news reports written by those that lived through the Great Civil War. One union private, Washington Robling, seemed to be in every major battle of the Civil War and lived to write about them all! Southern women like Mary Chestnut, living in southern cities under siege, kept great records of daily life of civilians during the war. What I loved about Burns’ opus was that you really get a sense of what life was like for all the parties involved: poor, rich, north, south, presidents, soldiers, slaves. The narration paints a vivid picture of the times, even the monotonous days of the most common souls involved. Consider this diary entry by Robert B. Ellie, a sailor on one of the Union’s iron-clad ships during the Civil War:
“The day has been so excessively hot that I am almost melted. The thermometer in the ward room stands at ninety degrees. While on deck the weather is very pleasant, a fair breeze blowing from the east. Everything is dirty. Everything smells bad. Everybody is demoralized. How are you Iron-clad? A man who would stay on an Iron Clad from choice is a candidate for the insane asylum, and any man who would stay by compulsion is an object of pity. Fresh leaks are breaking out every day...”
And the depictions of the battles were enthralling, despite no special effects or big-budget reenactments. With a simple map and read and blue boxes symbolizing the armies, the narrators, aided by the written records of those who were there, were able to give a rich description of the often pitched battles moment-by-moment. The battles were so bloody and so hard fought. They are incredible, inspiring, tragic, and awful all at the same moment. The description of the battle at Gettysburg was almost as moving as was the beautiful account of Lincoln’s famous address given there a year later. Great and horrible battles like Antietam, Cedar Creek, Bull Run, and of course, Gettysburg were discussed in very rich detail for a movie. And finally there was the telling of the scene at Appomattox Courthouse, the farm house of Wilbert McKlain, whose farm had been used as General Beauregard's headquarters at the first great battle of the civil war, and then was the scene of Lee’s famous surrender to U.S. Grant. One could say the war almost began and ended at this quaint farmhouse.
The Confederacy was doomed from the start. They were to be over-whelmed by the superior numbers, finances, and industry of the North. But until the Battle of Gettysburg, it seemed as if the Confederacy could in fact win. Whether winning or losing, the soldiers of the Confederate and Union armies, often brothers of soldiers from the opposing armies, had more in common than they had in contravention. During the siege of Atlanta, a southern bugle boy would play his trumpet every evening, so beautifully, that soldiers from the north and south would stop to listen, then resume their fighting each morning.
Sherman’s infamous march in 1864 and 1865 from Atlanta to Savannah (his “march to the sea”) was much discussed in the eighth film. It is an event that still invokes ire in parts of the South. Sherman burned Atlanta on his way out. After conquering Savannah he turned his army north and marched into South Carolina - the place where the rebellion began - and destroyed everything in sight. The photographs shown in the movie of these siege fallen places were just incredible. Just incredible.
Saying that the reasons for the war itself were relatively simple, is not to say that the personalities involved were not complex. No person of notoriety in the war was more so than Robert E. Lee. Offered command of the union army by Lincoln at the beginning of the war, Lee declined and instead fought for the Confederacy, not because he supported slavery - which he did not - but because he saw his first duty as being to Virginia. In fact, towards the end of the war, Lee requested that the Confederate Congress arm slaves to fight for the Confederacy, in return for their freedom after the war.

What to say about Abraham Lincoln? So much has been written, so many hundreds (thousands?) of books have been written about him that anything I could say here is “beyond our power to add or detract.” The movie did not focus on Lincoln so much, but at the center of the war and the divided nation was Lincoln. However, there was a dramatic, and depressing account of his assassination and of Mary Lincoln’s depression. Truly the man for the times, and I’m left believing, Lincoln was the greatest president our nation has known.
In the end, Burns' film took longer to make than it did to begin and conclude the war. And in the end, the Civil War unified the nation; with violence for sure, but it resolved those issues left to be decided by the founders when they crafted the Constitution. It also turned the notion of a United States from a vague concept into a reality. More than a million men who had never been very far from home before, finally saw the broad country as they trudged across it. The costs to unify the nation were great. In a nation of little more than 30 million people at the time, well over 600,000 Americans were dead (including civilians that died of starvation and disease, maybe the number is closer to one million). In the south, ¼ of the white males were dead. The price was so high, but after the cacophony of canon fire had died down, a much more durable nation was formed. Slavery was abolished, yet racially motivated immoral actions persisted. It was not the final test of the American experiment, but it was the end of a test to see if a “union so conceived could long endure.” It was, perhaps, the founding of a more perfect union.